To begin the summary, I want to cheat a little and include
the introductory paragraph. I tried to make it explain everything my paper
attempted to do….
It is the right time for readers’ advisory services (RA) to
grow into whole-library advisory services. Joyce Saricks has spearheaded the
work of RA becoming the base text in the majority of graduate level RA classes,
including our own. Her firm foundation has established a concrete way to step
around talking about genre and finding out why readers like books. This essay
argues for an expansion for her theories along with a critique of some of the
factors Saricks’s overlooks about library patrons. Whole-library advisory
becomes a welcome addition to Saricks’s method both enriching RA and expanding
advising theory across library platforms allowing patrons easier access to all
formats. After a discussion on theory and method this paper will dive into a
discussion of how whole-library advisory meets a need of access for patrons.
For a critique of Saricks, I used the work of Karen Dali
along with an explanatory example of whole-library advisory with video game
research. Dali’s work claims that Saricks misses that mark of ‘why’ a reader
picks up a book by focusing on appeals. Dali believes social and personal
reasons need to be taken into consideration to have a great RA conversation.
Her method has merit, but needs work on establishing the ‘how’. My thought was
to argue that combining the appeal-based conversation with the ‘why’ factors
would be easiest with incorporating all formats a patron consumes, this why
there is always something to point to as an example. A paper I found on video games provided the
basis and research for my theory to be shown as workable as in that format,
just like in books, there are both appeal-type factors and personal/social
factors (mood, fellowship, challenge) that need to be applied to grasp the real
reason a person enjoys the media.
The last main idea of the paper was that whole-library
advising is a need that has not been filled in the digital age. Companies like
Amazon, Netflix, and Apple are trying to figure out how to offer their users a
movie based on what book we bought in their digital store, and the companies
that do this best are enjoying great success. I state that libraries can become
a leader in this to stay relevant, as we offer this service in a very personal
way.
Yes! I think this really plays into the idea of integrated advisory that we discussed a few weeks ago. Being able to recommend a book based off a movie someone enjoyed, or a videogame based off of the graphic novel they've really gotten into--that's an idea that can expand a person's world. Not only are you giving them something based on the appeal factors that Saricks promotes, but you are also able to open up a whole new area of the library for them in which they might have had no prior interest. This is one of the reasons I want to do readers advisory and work with the public--being able to expand worlds and ultimately change lives (albeit, possibly small changes) ties into the rewarding feeling of helping people to really find something amazing.
ReplyDelete